Group Communications and making it REALLY work for you and your camps

 

A bit of rethinking this basic set of skills may yield some hefty dividends and better group participation

 

 Before becoming a Ranger, I spent some time running a public relations and marketing firm that eventually focused on the motorsports arena and finding sponsorships for a wide variety of NASCAR, ARCA, NHRA, and ProCup teams. Luckily, as I got into that line of work I had a terrific mentor that helped guide me along the way, offering sage advice and observations that helped shape a very sound approach in an often complicated and potentially compromising business. One of Neil’s homier proverbs had to do with communications and it was a simple and iron-clad rule. “Whoever it is you’re trying to reach,” he said, “ya gotta get ‘em where they is, not where they ain’t.” Not exactly rocket science, but it’s really amazing how we either forget this lesson or fail to incorporate it fully into what we are doing in order to get the maximum effect out of what we are trying to communicate.

 

This was driven home to me recently as a group of our volunteers began gelling together as an organized Construction Crew. Communicating what tasks we have and when we planned meetings and work dates proved to be more complicated than I ever imagined. In theory, I should have been able to just send out an e-mail or post card and that would be enough, but it wasn’t and for a long time the foreman of the group and I were frustrated that we couldn’t seem to get everyone all together until we realized that we were breaking the cardinal rule of “reaching them where they is”.

 

How? Well, we neglected to take into account that this group is actually made up of several generations of Scouts and Scouters, ranging in age from 15 to 68 years old. For a long time we groused about wishing everyone had an e-mail address, or that everyone would pay attention to post cards we would send out, but the fact of the matter is that each member of our group – and any potential future members – each had some preferred way of getting information that they actually paid attention to. It became pretty clear that to be truly effective in getting our messages out, we were going to have to use a number of different methods, not just one. And we were also going to have to define which way was preferred and what the best back-up form would be for each member if we were going to succeed in getting through to them.

 

5 methods of communication

            In a perfect world, we should be able to tell anyone something once for them to get the message and act upon it, but this isn’t a perfect world and when dealing with employees, repeating instructions or reminding them of dates is a good and accepted practice. When dealing with volunteers, even dedicated volunteers, the task is much more like herding cats and it forces good managers to cater a bit more to the idiosyncrasies of the individuals in the group. In a business setting you can frequently cut to the chase with some level of authority by sending out a memo or quick group e-mail, but with volunteers that strategy can quickly backfire, in which case you lose the very people you need most. But by simply “reaching them where they is”, you demonstrate that you care enough to communicate with them where they are comfortable or at least in the way that they prefer, and that will go miles in gaining cooperation and in finding additional recruits. So how exactly do we get our message out?

 

            There are essentially five categories that modern communication can be sorted into when trying to keep volunteers informed and to gain additional support for your projects. They are:

 

And that brings us to a very important point. It may not seem readily apparent, but various age groups tend to prefer different forms of communication. This is a generality, of course, and there are exceptions, but usually the older you are, the more conservative (and slower) forms of communication are what you prefer. In our Construction Corps for example, our older members tend to prefer phone calls or traditional snail mail since many don’t have computers or treat them with almost vile contempt. Middle-aged members usually prefer using the phone, responding best to a personal call, or use e-mail on a regular basis. But a surprise in all this was with our youngest members – those born since 1980 or so – don’t even use traditional e-mail, but are now using text messaging or a community like Facebook. It’s simply faster and easier.

We discovered by trial and error that if we concentrated on one form of communication, we could almost predict who would show up and who wouldn’t depending almost entirely on how the information was sent. So if we mailed post cards and called members, we could almost guarantee a turn-out of almost all older members, but if we sent out e-mails and phone calls, we got the middle-aged group. The Facebook crowd almost completely ignores anything that doesn’t make their cell phone chirp or computer beep, so “old-fashioned” answering machine messages left at home usually miss the mark entirely.

Since realizing this dynamic, we’ve been watching which forms of communication our members respond to the best. Since our group is still relatively small, this was a pretty easy matter, but even for larger groups, finding out which way is the best way to send a message is a prudent way to maximize the impact and effect of meeting notices, posting work dates, etc. In the future, we’ll be asking which top two ways members prefer to receive information and use one to back up the other. This means, that instead of mailing a newsletter to 1000 volunteers or group members, we may only snail mail 700 to folks who prefer snail mail as one of their top two forms of communication. To the 300 others, we may e-mail them a PDF of the same newsletter, provide them with a download link on their cell phones, or post it on our website for them to retrieve, whichever they prefer.

While this may seem like more work – and actually is in some ways – the benefits of communicating in this way in the long run will far outweigh the extra effort it takes to tailor the communication. For our small Construction Corps, this means that for a single gathering we’ll send out 10 post cards, about 25 e-mails, make another dozen or so phone calls, post an item on our website, and send out a group announcement to all our Facebook members. Add to that the actually face-to-face reminding and recruiting that goes on across the board, and we have a solid communications system that is far more effective in getting more volunteers out and promoting our efforts at the same time.

 

So here’s what to do…

 

1.      First, find out which way your members like to get news, announcements, and bulletins about your activities.  Be sure to have them pick a favorite and second favorite. Suggest the following:

a.       Word of mouth

b.      Postal mail

c.       Phone call

d.      E-mail

e.       Text Message

f.        Internet Community message (such as Facebook. Find out which one they are on or encourage them to go to one site, like Facebook)

g.       Posting to your organization’s website

h.       Other – specify

2.      Create notification lists placing each member in at least two of the categories.

3.      At least two weeks to 10 days before the event, do a mailing so the snail mail will arrive before the event.

4.      Have someone else who is good at it make the phone calls to those on the phone list.

5.      Have someone who is web savvy send out the e-mail announcement.

6.      Someone else who is good with texting should send out the text message to cell users.

7.      Post the event to your website.

8.      Watch your response and watch to see how far in advance your group needs to be notified. In some cases, a week will be fine, while for busier members, three or four weeks will be in order. In that case, adjust your timing so that members have enough advance notification to be able to plan for the event.

 

Three universals

            Even if you are doing all of the above, there are still three things you should do regardless of the communication preferences of the individuals in the group. The first is to publish a calendar of events as far out in advance as possible and make it available in as many forms as possible – printed copies you mail and hand out as promo pieces, PDFs on your website, etc. The second is to produce a newsletter or some other letter produced on a regular basis that, again, can be mailed, handed out, or made available on your website. Third, make sure you are promoting your group or groups by talking them up as often and wherever you can. As Ranger, try to get to as many council events as you can, and if you are close enough to get to District Roundtables or meetings, make a point of getting there every so often. Use those forums to update members of activities and opportunities at your camp – the personal appeal or invitation has always been the most beneficial of all communication forms. Together, these three form the universal dragnet of communication, but don’t make the common mistake of thinking this should be enough. In this day and age, it simply isn’t.

 

Thoughts on more effective Web communications

            Websites can be a great tool for communicating, but there are several developing trends that you need to consider so that you aren’t working too hard and missing your audience at the same time. First, writing web pages does take time – a lot of time in some cases – and for breaking news, announcements, and dialogs of any kind, websites may not be the best forum to use. The reason for this is most information of this kind has to change fast, faster than what most websites can be maintained at. Facebook and similar forums are much closer to realtime, far easier to maintain, and easier to post dialogs, exchanges, and so on. The drawback to the on-line communities like Facebook is that they are not (and never really were) intended to replace the vast quantities of information you can find on a website.

            In Scouting circles, websites are really just repositories and archives of important forms and information – great for the static kinds of promotional information that is needed to explain many things in depth. But the communities are where most of the young people are, and much more practical for rapid communication. The choice really isn’t one or the other, but to blend both into an effective tool. My advice is for most groups to use their website as the central information center and a community such as Facebook as the primary means of rapid communication with links back and forth between both. As communities develop, I think you will be seeing this trend more frequently.

 

Conclusion

            This may sound like an awful lot of work and it would seem to be a lot easier if you could get everyone onto one form of communication, but that isn’t realistic especially if you are dealing with a multigenerational group. If you have a club consisting of all retired seniors, then one communication form may work. The same goes for if you have a Venture Crew or Explorer Post that helps out. But in either of these cases, it still pays to understand which form of communication your members prefer. Regardless, you have to think of communication as an investment and not as a waste of time or necessary evil. Instead, remember that it can pay off huge dividends and gain you additional members and help. Like the man said, “Ya need ta reach ‘em where they is, not where they ain’t.”

 

Ranger Tim Bongard, Camp Acahela and Goose Pond Scout Reservation  

If you have any questions, or comments, please send them to tbongard@nepabsa.org .